(The Center Square) – Homes in Wisconsin continue to get more expensive, even as last month saw a bit of a slowdown in sales.
The latest Wisconsin Realtors Report shows a nearly 3% dip in sales compared to May of last year.
“Existing home sales fell 2.8% year over year in May,” the report noted. “Year-to-date sales increased by 2.6% compared to the first five months of 2025.”
The dip in sales, however, did not translate to a dip in prices. In fact, prices went up last month.
“The statewide median home price rose 6.8% to $352,500,” the report added.
One of the reasons why prices continue to grow, real estate agents say there simply aren’t enough homes for sale.
“Inventory remains constrained at 4.1 months statewide, unchanged from last year. [And] new listings increased 0.8%, and total listings increased 2.5% year over year,” according to the report.
“Millennials represent our largest population cohort, and the current inventory weakness has a big impact on that demographic group,” Realtors CEO Tom Larson said. “Although the homes listed at the top of the price distribution show plenty of inventory, very few first-time buyers are buying homes at or above $500,000. It’s the homes listed under $350,000 that are primary targets for new buyers, and these homes are unfortunately in very short supply.”
There are some parts of Wisconsin where buyers can find homes less than $500,000, but not many.
The report said the median home price in central Wisconsin is $289,900. But the median price in the Madison-area remains the highest in the state at $415,000. In the Milwaukee and southeast Wisconsin area, the median price last month inched-up to $365,000.
Unsurprisingly, most of the homes sold last month were in the Madison and Milwaukee areas.
In all, the report said 6,553 sales closed in May. Those homes spent an average of 69 days on the market.

(The Center Square) – A Wisconsin state senator is pledging to make changes after a Thursday Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling that a minority scholarship aid program was unconstitutional.
Wisconsin Sen. Dora Drake, D-Milwaukee, said that she intends to introduce a bill that will restart the grant program for students based on income and zip code instead of the qualifications in the program since it began in 1985, including those who are “Black American,” “American Indian,” “Hispanic” or a former citizen of Laos, Vietnam or Cambodia who entered the country in 1976 or later.
Drake received the scholarship while she attended Marquette. The program awarded between $250 and $2,500 per year to students. The scholarships went to private college and technical college students.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that the program violated the Equal Protection Clause in the 14th Amendment. The case was filed by filed by six taxpayers against the Wisconsin Higher Educational Aids Board and Executive Secretary Connie Hutchinson, who was in charge of administering the grants.
The ruling was based on precedent from a 2023 U.S. Supreme Court ruling.
“That federal case was based on admissions while this program is about a student retention enacted by the state legislature and funded since 1985,” Drake, Chair of the Wisconsin Legislative Black Caucus, said in a statement. “They are setting a dangerous precedent by applying this federal ruling to distinctly different programs.”
Sen. Eric Wimberger, R-Gillett, applauded the ruling and said that it showed that a bill he sponsored, Assembly Bill 669, was the right move because it would have ended race-based scholarships in the state. That bill was vetoed by Gov. Tony Evers.
“Giving benefits based solely on race presumes someone has individual personal characteristics simply because they belong to a race category,” Wimberger said in a statement. “That is stereotyping and racism at their plainest and simplest.
“The Higher Education Aids Board could not identify to the Court any objectives or benefits it hoped to achieve through the policy. The Court is right today to call race-based government policies for what they are: odious.”
Wimberger vowed to continue to work to end other state programs that are solely based upon race because he wants to “pursue equality under the law.”
Drake said that the decision “emboldens an extreme conservative agenda” that hopes to end all protections and programs “to remove all disparities in America and secure a fair democracy for all.”
“We can’t continue to make the same mistakes like our nation did post reconstruction and Jim Crow if we do we will never achieve true equity in our democracy.” Drake said.
Drake called a constitutional amendment on the Nov. 3 statewide ballot “misleading.” The billt would prohibit Wisconsin governmental entities from giving preferential treatment based on race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin. She said the programs are meant to eliminate disparities between those groups.
“Legislators like State Sen. Dora Drake benefitted from these programs, and now countless Black and Brown Wisconsinites won’t have the same opportunities because of the Supreme Court’s decision,” WisDems spokesperson Philip Shulman said in a statement. “Even worse is this decision will undoubtedly set the stage for more rulings that undercut similar programs and further disenfranchise Wisconsinites.
“This fight is not over, and I am confident we will see Democrats fight this ruling and continue to give every Wisconsinite the best chance possible to make a better life for themselves.”

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin’s unemployment rate dropped to 3.4% in May, down from 3.5% in April.
The state also saw 5,800 more people employed year over year while the labor force participation rate remained at 64.4% in what Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development Office of Economic Advisors Section Chief Scott Hodek called “a bit of a mixed bag.”
Hodek said it “speaks to the strength of the U.S. economy that we’re still seeing growth” despite the war in Iraq and U.S. tariff implications.
Hodek said the data was similar to prior seasonal patterns and the economy has “cooled a bit overall” while “this month’s data relatively positive.”
The state has 9,000 more construction jobs than the year with 8,900 more in private education and health services and 7,100 more in leisure and hospitality.
Wisconsin was down 11,600 jobs in trade and 3,700 in manufacturing over the year.

(The Center Square) – The future of property taxes in Wisconsin remains one of the largest topics along with affordability heading into this fall’s elections.
This week, congressman and candidate-for-governor Tom Tiffany pointed to a ranking that showed Wisconsin is 43rd in terms of property tax rates, just higher than Iowa (42nd) and trailing only last place Illinois in the Midwest.
“We have to fix this,” Tiffany wrote while sharing the property tax map. “There is no reason Wisconsin should rank alongside New York, New Jersey, and Illinois for some of the highest property taxes in America.
“Wisconsin Democrats stuck you with a 400-year property tax hike and told you to ‘deal with it.’ That ends on day one.”
Wisconsin voters will have the opportunity to block a future governor from repeating the partial veto from Gov. Tony Evers that led to the 400-year K-12 school funding increase with a constitutional referendum on the November ballot that would end a governor’s ability to “create or increase or authorize the creation or increase of any tax or fee.”
Evers used the current veto power to erase numbers and a hyphen to change the year “2024-25” to “2425” in a school appropriation in the budget bill.
That meant a $325 per student per year funding increase for the next 400 years was allowed and later upheld in a 4-3 ruling from the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
A Marquette Law School poll earlier this year showed that 58% of registered voters polled were more concerned about property taxes than funding for K-12 public schools while 41% said the opposite.
Republicans have pointed to Evers’ partial veto as a reason property taxes have and will continue to increase in the state while Democrats have said that those increases have been necessary because the state needs to fund more of the cost of K-12 schools.
The K-12 education portion of Wisconsin property tax bills rose 7.8% this year, the largest rise in more than three decades, according to a Wisconsin Policy Forum report released in December.
All Wisconsin Senate Democrats voted against a $1.8 billion surplus bill that 80% of voters in a Marquette Law School poll believe should have been passed. The bill was a bipartisan agreement between Evers, outgoing Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu.
The bill included $300 or $600 income tax refund checks, $600 million for schools and an end to taxes on tips and overtime. It passed the Assembly and was voted down 18-15 in the Senate.

(The Center Square) – A Wisconsin college grant program that sent financial aid to students based on specific race, national origin and ancestry cannot legally operate because it violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Thursday.
The ruling came after a Wisconsin Court of Appeals ruling that attaining diversity in higher education is no longer a compelling interest that allowed for an exception to the Equal Protection Clause. The case was filed by filed by six taxpayers against the Wisconsin Higher Educational Aids Board and Executive Secretary Connie Hutchinson, who was in charge of administering the grants.
The grans program began in 1985 for students attending private and technical colleges in the state who were a minority undergraduate who was a “Black American,” “American Indian,” “Hispanic” or a former citizen of Laos, Vietnam or Cambodia who entered the country in 1976 or later.
Justice Jill Karofsky concurred with the opinion of the court but wrote separately in her opinion, joined by Susan Crawford, on the benefits of the scholarship program.
“Despite this documented success, the grant program’s explicit reliance on race is fatal to its constitutionality for the reasons explained in Justice Dallet’s concurring opinion,” Karofsky wrote. “A suggested alternative means of maintaining a grant program to improve retention would be to target individuals who are economically disadvantaged, since there is also a statistical correlation between economic disadvantage and low retention rates.
“While this alternative aligns with the Supreme Court’s ruling in SFFA, it falls short because it does not acknowledge the racial inequality underlying the problem.”

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin’s Department of Public Instruction framed its new Portrait of a Graduate initiative from a steering committee that included employers and those in Wisconsin’s industries that would help frame what graduates need to know.
But the steering committee actually included just one member of private industry in Wisconsin, Sargento’s Anne Troka, along with 26 public employees from the state, according to the response to a records request from The Dairyland Sentinel.
The committee is filled with high school teachers and members of the Family, Career and Community Leaders of America along with members of state agencies such as the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development and Wisconsin Economic Development Corp.
DPI presented the initiative as an effort to define the “knowledge, skills and experience” that graduates need to be prepared for “college, careers, community leadership and civic life.”
Rather than providing the list of 27 members of the steering committee, DPI made Dairyland Sentinel’s question a public records request.
“Shifting a routine press question into the statutory open records track is a classic government delay tactic,” Dairyland Sentinel wrote. “It allowed DPI to avoid answering immediate questions during the launch week, effectively killing the immediate news cycle and buying the department weeks of silence while they promoted their unvetted narrative through friendly channels.”
The department also said that there were no documents showing the selection process or criteria to be invited to join the committee.
Critics questioned the initiative when it was announced because it didn’t mention basics such as improving reading, writing or math scores.
Questions surrounding the new initiative follow Dairyland Sentinel’s questions related to a 2024 Forward Exam standards-setting conference in the Wisconsin Dells that has led to a lawsuit over a potential Open Meetings Act violation involving the conference as well as a multiple year battle over public records related to DPI’s efforts to keep details of the $369,000 conference hidden from the public.
IRG’s General Counsel and Director of its Center for Investigative Oversight Jake Curtis told The Center Square in February that he believed the 88-member standards-setting group filled with school employees and leaders fits the exact definition of an Ad Hoc Committee and that meetings of that committee should be public and not subject to the non-disclosure agreements signed by conference attendees.
Dairyland Sentinel has asked Wisconsin’s Department of Justice to intervene on a public records request related to the conference that the outlet believes is still incomplete.
Dairyland Sentinel Publisher Brian Fraley previously told The Center Square that he believes there are minutes and recordings from the conference that should be public records that DPI has not released related to its workshop and that he plans to continue to fight for those records.

(The Center Square) – Many of Wisconsin’s representatives in Congress spent Wednesday talking about something other than Iran.
Most of the state’s eight members of Congress were silent about President Trump’s deal with Iran.
Green Bay-area Republican Tony Wied was the only member of the House to talk about the deal on social media.
“President Trump has made it clear that he does not want endless wars in the Middle East. I completely agree,” he wrote. “Yet as soon as a peace deal emerges, the swamp attacks it. They either want to see America fail or want to see endless wars continue. I want to see this war come to an end, and I am grateful to have a president who is pursuing peace through strength to protect our country and the American people.”
Wisconsin’s two U.S. senators also addressed the deal. They were, as expected, split on the agreement.
“And now he’s claiming victory without a permanent solution in hand,” Democrat Sen. Tammy Baldwin said on Capitol Hill Wednesday. “We are in a worse position than when President Trump started this war. That is why Donald Trump’s ‘wink and nod’ promise is simply not enough.”
Baldwin said she, and her constituents, want a guarantee that the war in Iran is over once and for all.
Republican Sen. Ron Johnson on Wednesday said the president’s deal with Iran is “bowing to reality.”
“President Trump recognizes the reality that the Iranian people were not able to overthrow the regime and that Americans would not support a ground war to defeat it. So [the president] made a deal to open the Strait of Hormuz to limit economic damage and carefully monitor the regime’s behavior moving forward,” Johnson wrote on X.
Johnson added that if Iran walks away from the 60-day memorandum of understanding, or doesn’t deliver on its end, the United States can and will act.
“You can always go back in there,” Johnson said.

(The Center Square) – The top seven Democrats running for Wisconsin governor and the candidates to replace Congressman Tom Tiffany in the 7th Congressional District both have televised debates scheduled before the state’s Aug. 11 primary.
Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes, current Lt. Gov. Sara Rodriguez, state Rep. Francesca Hong, state Sen. Kelda Roys, Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley, businessman Joel Brennan and former Wisconsin Economic Development Corp. CEO Missy Hughes are all scheduled to take part in a July 28 debate on WISN moderated by WISN 12 News’ journalists Gerron Jordan and Matt Smith.
Hong led a Marquette Law School poll with 14% support, followed by Barnes (11%), Crowley (3%), Rodriguez (3%), Brennan (2%), Roys (1%) and Hughes (1%).
Tiffany is the Republican primary favorite.
The debate between Democrat candidates for the office will be hosted at Weasler Auditorium on the Marquette University campus and will be broadcast on the WISN website along with WISN and partner stations in Green Bay (WBAY), Madison (WKOW), Wausau (WAOW), Eau Claire (WQOW) and La Crosse (WXOW).
“A majority of Wisconsin voters are currently undecided in this primary election, making the debate especially important before people head to the polls,” President and General Manager of WISN 12 Shawn Oswald said in a statement. “Wisconsin voters deserve clear answers about where each candidate stands on the important issues.”
WJFW Newswatch 12 will hold two live debates in July with candidates for the 7th Congressional District.
The Republican debate will be from 5 to 6:30 p.m. on July 7 with Michael Alfonso, Jessi Ebben, and Niina Baum. The station said that Kevin Hermening has not committed to attending.
The Democratic debate will be from 5 to 6:30 p.m. on July 14 with Chris Armstrong, Ginger Murray and Fred Clark attending.
The debates will be broadcast live on WJFW and will include a 10-minute intermission and streamed on the station’s website and Facebook page.
WJFW anchor Dan Hagen will be moderator for both events.
“The last time Wisconsin’s 7th Congressional District held an openseat election — with no incumbent on the ballot — was the Special Election in 2020,” WJFW News Director Geoff Weller said in a statement. “District 7 voters deserve clear answers on where each candidate stands on important issues. Two live, 90-minute debates will add clarity to this race.”

(The Center Square) – Kirk Bangstad is moving ahead with his case against the state of Wisconsin over his seized beer.
Bangstad, the one-time Democrat candidate for governor, filed a lawsuit in Dane County court against the state’s Department of Revenue.
His suit accuses the state of treating his beer “differently than substantially identical beer produced within the state of Wisconsin.”
Bangstad is asking the judge for an injunction and to return the nearly $25,000 in beer that DOR agents seized last week.
The Department of Revenue is not commenting on the lawsuit and has not said much about the bust at Bangstad’s taprooms in both Madison and Minocqua.
Bangstad said the state seized the beer because he failed to pay $500 in state excise taxes on his beer that is brewed in Illinois.
Bangstad has claimed that he tried to pay the tax but was not given the opportunity.
Over the weekend, Bangstad wrote on Facebook that he is being targeted by Gov. Tony Evers because he has criticized the governor. Bangstad also claimed that he is being targeted by the Tavern League because of his dislike of Wisconsin’s liquor regulations.
Bangstad doubled-down on those claims in his latest Substack post.
“I’m putting out a call to all breweries, distilleries, and wineries in Wisconsin who have been similarly discriminated against by the Tavern-League-backed Wisconsin Department of Revenue. If we pool our resources, we can better afford this lawsuit that will hopefully even the playing field between Wisconsin’s small producers and the distribution monopolies that keep us down,” Bangstad wrote. “There’s a target on my company’s back for a reason, and that reason is because we’re slowly helping move Wisconsin FORWARD—a direction in which Republicans haven’t allowed us to move for over 20 years.”
Bangstad announced a campaign for governor last month, but that fizzled after the Wisconsin Elections Commission said he did not gather enough valid signatures to make the primary ballot.

(The Center Square) – A federal judge denied former Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan’s request to be acquitted or receive a new trial Tuesday.
District Judge Lynn Adelman denied the appeal, rejecting the three claims from Dugan’s lawyers that would allow for the case to be reheard.
“Defendant argues that ICE was acting as a law enforcement agency here,” Adelman wrote. “But this ignores the fact that, unlike, say, the FBI, ICE can issue its own warrants and adjudicate and effectuate a removal, as it did with Flores-Ruiz, without the involvement of a court.”
Dugan was found guilty of a felony charge of obstruction by a jury in December after she was accused of obstructing the arrest of a defendant in her court by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers outside of her courtroom.
The jury found Dugan not guilty of a misdemeanor charge of concealing related to defendant Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, who was later arrested on the street outside the courthouse and has since been deported.
Dugan resigned from her judge role after her conviction.

(The Center Square) – Federal officials announced charges Tuesday against eight people accused of defrauding taxpayers of more than $1.3 million through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Among those arrested was a Minneapolis man alleged to have stolen more than $1.1 million in benefits.
The arrests were highlighted as part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s “Tuesday Takedown,” which targeted alleged SNAP fraud schemes ranging from more than $1,000 to more than $1.1 million.
“Steal from SNAP. Get Busted,” USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins wrote on social media Tuesday morning. “These 8 fraudsters thought they could steal food assistance money and get away with it.”
According to the USDA, the largest case involved Abdidwahid Mohamed of Minneapolis, who is accused of defrauding more than $1.1 million from SNAP. Also known as food stamps, SNAP provides food assistance to approximately 40 million low-income Americans and is administered by states with federal funding and oversight from USDA.
The announcement comes less than a week after federal authorities celebrated the first arrest from the FBI’s newly-launched “Most Wanted Fraudsters” list, as previously reported by The Center Square.
Minnesota has come under scrutiny from the Trump administration’s “war on fraud” efforts. Estimates place fraud losses in the state at between $9 billion and $20 billion, and some state officials are even facing criminal investigations tied to allegations they failed to stop widespread taxpayer-funded fraud.
U.S. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., has led some of the investigations into fraud in Minnesota. He said on Monday that accountability is coming.
“States can no longer look the other way,” Comer said, applauding federal efforts to pass legislation addressing fraud. “Criminals are being held accountable.”
Rollins identified the eight individuals charged in Tuesday’s announcement as:
• Timesha Fleming of Summerville, South Carolina – $76,502.
• Jenny Quinones of Amsterdam, New York – more than $12,000.
• Tiffany Butler of Sprakers, New York – $50,525.
• Abdidwahid Mohamed of Minneapolis, Minnesota – more than $1.1 million.
• J’Anne Mizro of Auburn, New York – more than $1,000.
• Jennifer Geddings of Sumter, South Carolina – $21,716.
• Lina Orovio-Hernandez of Boston, Massachusetts – $43,348.
• Aisha Carr of Milwaukee, Wisconsin – $2,808.
USDA did not immediately release additional details about the individual cases, though Rollins said the arrests are just the beginning.
“[USDA Food and Nutrition] is coming for everyone attempting to defraud the American taxpayer,” she said.

(The Center Square) – Charlie Berens knows that not everyone agrees with him on data centers.
But the Wisconsin comedian also knows that a lot of people do.
He’s read the polls, he’s done the research and last weekend he was the keynote speaker at the United West Wisconsin regional response to data centers in Eau Claire, attempting to bring the communities together for a common cause.
“I would love to stick with comedy,” Berens told the crowd. “I will stick with comedy as soon as our politicians stick with policy and stop protecting big tech and start protecting the people who put them into office.”
Berens wasn’t the only speaker or only comedian at the event. But he was the most well-known as he followed up speakers like Ed Gorell of the Wisconsin Farmers Union, who said that his group is opposed to allowing data centers to increase local electricity rates, contaminate local water supplies and increase local tax burdens or those that are built on prime farm land.
Gorell went on to list tax increment districts and overuse of the term blight to give data centers breaks that other businesses don’t receive.
Berens cited the recent Marquette Law School poll, which showed that 69% of voters believe the costs of data centers are greater and 30% believing that the benefits are higher.
The Center Square Voters’ Voice Poll, released Tuesday, found that 62% of voters believe local governments should be cautious while 24% believe that they should encourage new data centers because they create jobs, tax revenue, and support America’s digital economy.
The poll asked voters if they believed data centers can place strain on electricity, water, land and local infrastructure.
A report earlier this year from the American Energy Institute showed that foreign billionaires have provided funding upwards of $39 million to the anti-AI data center movement in the United States, something that Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute, told The Center Square earlier this year showed that data center opposition is not “organic or purely local” and that transparency matters with what the report showed.
In Wisconsin, however, opposition has grown related to the four largest projects in the state.
A report earlier this year from Wisconsin’s Legislative Audit Bureau showed that the state will forego $1.5 billion in sales tax to four data center projects in initial construction and then $369 million more annually once the projects are completed.
Wisconsin’s exemption, enacted in the 2023-25 budget, applies to everything from property purchases to computer servers and energy systems at the site to electricity and cooling systems.
The exemptions apply to Microsoft’s $20.6 billion in data centers in Wisconsin along with OpenAI, Oracle and Vantage Data Centers’ $15 billion in data center in Port Washington. Epic Hosting’s $347 million project in Verona and Meta’s $1 billion project in Beaver Dam are also included.
Berens told the crowd that the largest threat to big tech and AI is the organic movement against data centers, because it’s the one thing he believes they can’t buy. He believes that Wisconsin and the federal government need to enact legislation that data centers must follow because “there are more regulations on a bratwurst than the entire artificial intelligence industry.”
“Our politicians have failed us,” Berens said. “They left Madison without passing anything. Could you imagine getting paid to do some work and you show up for work and you leave without doing your job?”
Wisconsin congressman and leading Republican gubernatorial candidate Tom Tiffany has said that he will end tax breaks for data centers if he is elected governor.
Metro Milwaukee Association of Commerce President Dale Kooyenga, however, has advocated for the continued use of data center sales tax exemptions in Wisconsin, saying that construction workers on the projects are paying income and property taxes that exceed the value of the sales tax exemptions and the projects would not come to the state without the sales tax break.
“As a CPA, it is not a ‘cost’ if you never had the revenue or expense,” Kooyenga wrote. “There is no hole in the budget; in fact, there are more state resources because the policy brought economic activity to WI, and an existing funding stream or expenditure didn’t have to be cut.
“Ratepayers will not subsidize electrical rates, property taxpayers do not subsidize TIFs and a sales tax exemption does not mean that this is ‘costing’ WI taxpayers.”

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin’s governor continues to insist his 400-year veto is not a guaranteed tax increase, but education experts say he’s not telling the truth.
Gov. Tony Evers told the crowd at last weekend’s Democrat State Convention that he is proud of his 400-year veto that added $325 per-student to Wisconsin’s school funding formula for the next four centuries.
“Do you know what really gets wound up? When I use my veto pen to do what is best for our kids and our schools,” Evers said to a round of applause. “I guess they’re not as jazzed as I was when I used my veto pen to provide a $325 increase for every student, and every school district for the next 400 years.”
Evers used his veto power back in 2023 to change what was supposed to be a two-year school funding increase into a 400-year school funding hike. A lawsuit immediately followed, but the Wisconsin Supreme Court sided with the governor, and his 400-year veto stood.
Many Republicans blamed the governor’s veto for the double-digit property tax increases that many Wisconsin homeowners saw earlier this year.
On Saturday, Evers said his veto is not to blame.
“Let’s get something straight, my 400-year veto isn’t an automatic property tax increase,” Evers explained. “I know that, because that’s not how the school funding system works in Wisconsin.”
But Will Flanders, an education expert with the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, said the governor is not exactly being truthful.
“The governor is trying to hide the reality of this situation by assuming the Legislature could simply provide enough funding to offset the $325 annual increase, and that school boards could choose not to increase spending by that amount. Neither assumption is realistic. There is no plausible scenario in which the Legislature can indefinitely keep pace with the roughly $130,000 in additional spending per student that the governor’s vetoes have put Wisconsin on a path toward. And history shows that few school boards have met a revenue limit increase they don’t like.”
Flanders said Evers essentially created a situation where property taxes are going to have to increase.
“Local property taxpayers will continue to bear the burden of the governor’s 400-year veto. No hypothetical dream scenario can change that reality,” Flanders added.

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin Lt. Gov. Sara Rodriguez led a straw poll in the race for Wisconsin governor released Sunday, followed by state Rep. Francesca Hong, D-Madison, and state Sen. Kelda Roys, D-Madison.
The poll, conducted by WisPolitics at the Democratic State Convention, showed former Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes (41 votes) running sixth behind Rodriguez (164), Hong (138), Roys (114), Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley (78), businessman Joel Brennan (52) and former Wisconsin Economic Development Corp. CEO Missy Hughes (10) trailing.
“I look forward to continuing my work to earn support & ask you to join our fight,” Rodriguez posted in response to the poll. “If you want to beat @TomTiffanyWI you’re damn right I am the proven winner who is ready to do it!”
Wisconsin’s primaries will be Aug. 11.
Congressman Tom Tiffany is the favorite to win the Republican nomination with 40% support in a recent Marquette Law School poll, trailed by Andy Manske (6%) with the remainder undecided.
Hong led in that poll with 14% support, followed by Barnes (11%), Crowley (3%), Rodriguez (3%), Brennan (2%), Roys (1%) and Hughes (1%).
Those at the convention also favored former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg to be the Democratic nominee for president (102), edging U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (101).
Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker was third (81) was the only other candidate that received more than 50 votes.
Americans for Prosperity-Wisconsin said that the straw poll results showed that Wisconsin Democrats wanted to double down on failed policies.
“While Democrats’ theme this weekend was Saving the American Dream, Tom Tiffany actually plans to save the American Dream for Wisconsin by repealing the 400-year property tax, protecting farmers, lowering utility rates, and defending education freedom,” AFP-WI State Director Megan Novak said in a statement. “We have a choice in November. Will we continue allowing Madison Democrats to push the American Dream out of reach, or will we put Tom at the helm so we can right the ship and make Wisconsin a beacon of freedom in the Midwest?”

(The Center Square) – Kirk Bangstad is accusing Wisconsin’s governor of playing politics with the seizure of beer from two of his taprooms.
Bangstad, the one-time candidate for governor, over the weekend said the state’s Department of Revenue seized about $25,000 worth of beer because the beer is brewed out of state, saying he didn’t have the proper permits, and he didn’t pay the correct taxes.
“Now that our beer is mostly being made in Illinois, we build a refrigerated warehouse in Madison to be able to distribute it throughout Wisconsin from a central location. The Wisconsin Department of Revenue alcohol enforcement division tells us we need a permit to store beer at that warehouse,” Bangstad wrote on Facebook. “All in all, they probably took $25K worth of beer from us yesterday and haven’t put it under refrigeration to keep it fresh – all because we weren’t allowed to pay approximately $500 in Wisconsin excise taxes.”
Bangstad claimed he tried to pay the tax, but he said the state refused to accept it.
The Department of Revenue confirmed that Bangstad is under investigation and told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that state law prohibits beer brewed in Illinois to be sold in Wisconsin without a permit or license.
Bangstad argued that those state laws are unfair.
“Every one of the issues that led to my beer being seized yesterday stemmed from me simply trying to sell my beer online to Wisconsinites and customers around the country that want to buy it. If the Department of Revenue Alcohol Enforcement Division was able to relax these laws during Covid, with statistics showing that no harm was done to folks having beer delivered to their doorstep versus driving to a store to buy it, they shouldn’t be dropping the hammer on breweries that want to do it today,” Bangstad said.
Bangstad also said he is suing to get his beer back.
“The Minocqua Brewing Company has sued Wisconsin’s Department of Revenue over their seizure of approximately $25K of our beer. We had to act quickly – not only because our beer will spoil if left unrefrigerated, but because we will go bankrupt if we don’t have beer to sell during Minocqua’s busy summer tourism season,” he wrote.
And then Bangstad got political.
“We also suspect that the Department of Revenue’s actions last week were just the first steps in attempting to revoke our brewer’s permit and put us permanently out of business – not because we’re breaking laws, but because we’ve successfully angered the politically-influential alcohol distributors in Wisconsin’s Tavern League by selling our beer online, and because I’ve relentlessly criticized the Department of Revenue’s ultimate boss – Gov. Tony Evers – for being asleep at the wheel while Trump steamrolls American Democracy,” Bangstad posted on Facebook.
Neither the governor nor the Tavern League have commented on Bangstad’s claims.

(The Center Square) – A conservative Wisconsin Supreme Court justice once again called the court’s decision to hear an appeal of a three-judge panel’s ruling on the state’s congressional maps an “activist court” doing the “bidding of its political masters.”
The court stated it would hear a second congressional map challenge and did so while acknowledging that it’s uncertain whether it has the authority to review the rulings of a three-judge panel assigned to the case.
The order in the Elizabeth Bothfeld v. Wisconsin Elections Commission case comes less than two weeks after a similar ruling in a case filed by the Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy.
“The Democratic Party bought multiple seats on this court to achieve yet another outcome unobtainable democratically,” Justice Rebecca Bradley wrote in dissent. “Like last time, the United States Supreme Court will likely reverse the majority’s unlawful ruling and protect our Republic. No kings. No queens either.”
Both cases argue that Wisconsin’s current maps were gerrymandered and created in an unconstitutional way.
The Bothfeld case was rejected by a panel including Dane County Judge Julie Genovese, Milwaukee County Judge Mark Sanders and Outagamie County Judge Emily Lonergan.
The originally drawn maps were challenged after the 2020 U.S. Census and four maps were submitted to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, including maps from Gov. Tony Evers and the state’s Republican Congress members. Ultimately, the court chose Evers’ maps.
“We acknowledge that there is an unresolved question as to whether an ‘appeal’ from a final decision or order of a panel in an apportionment challenge is a matter of right or a matter of this court’s discretion,” the order to hear the case stated. “We conclude that it is not necessary to resolve this issue in this case because it will not affect the outcome.”
The minority of conservative judges disagree and, in dissent, wrote that the court should have analyzed if it had standing to review the case before hearing it.
“Entertaining Bothfeld’s previously rejected theory to once again overturn a map that was already ordered by this court, well outside the court’s normal constitutional boundaries, smacks of judicial overreach,” Justice Annette Ziegler wrote in dissent, joined by Bradley. “Moreover, this order will not be published, thus limiting accessibility of the public. This is an unprecedented matter of public import, and every effort should be made to make the public aware of this issue.”