(The Center Square) – Milwaukee’s school superintendent says she can save tens of millions of dollars by cutting hundreds of non-classroom jobs.
Superintendent Brenda Cassellius plans to ask the city’s school board to cut more than 260 positions in the next Milwaukee Public School budget. The savings could net $30 million.
“Protecting classrooms and supporting high‑quality instruction remains our top priority throughout this budget process,” Cassellius said. “These changes will be hard, but by reducing positions outside the classroom amid our budget challenges, we can put more resources where they matter most: in the classroom.”
Many of the layoffs that Cassellius is eyeing are vacancies.
In addition to protecting classroom teachers, Cassellius’ plan would also protect counselors, social workers, psychologists and nurses.
“Recently completed financial audits confirmed the structural deficit, including a $46 million gap at the end of last school year,” Cassellius’ office said in a statement.
While classroom teachers would be protected in Cassellius’ plan. Central office workers would not be.
“The approximately 263 position reductions include bout 116 positions from the offices of Academics; Communications; Family, Community, and Partnership; Finance; Human Resources; Operations; Schools office; and the Superintendent’s office,” the superintendent’s office said. “About 147 positions, including assistant principals, deans of students, and implementers.”
Casselius will ask the school board to support her plan during a special school board meeting on Monday, but her layoffs proposal is already facing opposition.
Milwaukee’s teachers union, the Milwaukee Teachers Education Association, says it doesn’t want to see any job cuts.
“No rank-and-file worker should face the possibility of losing their job, and the board should not blindly trust this administration to act in the best interest of MPS students,” President Ingrid Walker-Henry said.
The union has asked for a specific, job-by-job list of positions that could be cut.

(The Center Square) – Conservative Wisconsin state Supreme Court Justice Annette Ziegler announced on Monday that she will not be seeking reelection.
Ziegler first was elected to the court in 2007 and was reelected in 2017 without opposition, the only time that has occurred in two decades.
“While I will not be a candidate next year, my appreciation for the people of Wisconsin and the judicial system I have been privileged to serve in remains as strong as ever,” Ziegler said in a statement. “I look forward to finishing out the rest of my term on the court and handing the baton to a new justice in 2027.”
The ideological makeup of the court has been a high-stakes issue in the state in recent years with record spending last year in the race won by Susan Crawford over Brad Schimel that left the court with four liberal justices and three conservatives.
Conservative Maria Lazar and liberal Chris Taylor are set for an April 7 election to fill the seat of conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley.
Before reaching the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Ziegler was a judge in Washington County and then a District III Deputy Chief Judge.
Before that, Ziegler was an assistant U.S. attorney, and a special assistant district attorney as well as working in private practice following her graduation from Marquette University Law School.
“I am incredibly proud that in all my elections I had support from a broad spectrum of legal, civic, law enforcement and political leaders – both Democrats and Republicans – who believed in my commitment to fairness, ethics and the rule of law,” Ziegler said. “I am also grateful to my colleagues on the Supreme Court, both past and present, for their faith in me by choosing me to serve as chief justice for two terms.”

(The Center Square) – Only 9% of University of Wisconsin-Madison faculty identify as conservative while 70% identify as liberal, according to a new faculty poll from the school’s Department of Political Science and Tommy G. Thompson Center on Public Leadership.
The poll also showed that junior faculty were more likely to identify as liberal than senior faculty, meaning the ideological gap could expand in the future.
“The findings paint a picture of an environment where conservative faculty feel marginalized and face differential treatment,” said Center Director Alex Tahk, an associate professor of political science. “But there are also grounds for optimism: large majorities of faculty, regardless of ideology or race, believe it is important for both underrepresented racial groups and conservatives to feel included on campus.”
The survey was sent to 2,388 faculty members with 633 completed responses sent back. Incomplete responses were not included in the results. The survey was first sent Nov. 19 and responses were accepted through Jan. 23.
The poll is in line with what bill sponsor Rep. Amanda Nedweski, R-Pleasant Prairie, said while pushing a campus free speech law. The proposal would carry a punishment of two academic years of frozen tuition if a school violates any of the requirements of the bill multiple times in a five-year period.
Nedweski cited during testimony a report from The College Fix showing that more than 99% of donations from UW system professors went to Democrats, not Republicans, using 2021-22 Federal Election Commission data.
“We designed this study to move past assumptions and get rigorous evidence,” Tahk said. “I don’t think the findings will entirely fit anyone’s preconceptions.”
The survey also found that race was not the main factor in ideology. Faculty of color where slightly more conservative than their white colleagues.
In terms of hiring, faculty showed that they were up to 38 percentage points more likely to penalize a conservative view than a liberal one.
“Further proof that there is little intellectual diversity in higher education today,” former Republican Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker wrote on social media.
Further proof that there is little intellectual diversity in higher education today. https://t.co/lBZlK895no— Scott Walker (@ScottWalker) March 9, 2026
Liberal faculty were also more likely to express controversial views while conservative faculty reported experiencing consequences at a substantially higher rate. Conservative faculty also reported feeling less comfortable expressing their views and felt less welcome on campus with less confidence that their speech rights would be protected.

(The Center Square) – A Wisconsin bill would ban student cell phone use throughout the school day, expanding on a previous law that requires all school districts to approve a plan to prohibit cell phones during instructional time by July 1.
Assembly Bill 948 passed the Assembly on its final day of session and passed the Senate Committee on Education with a 4-1 vote on Friday after a public hearing earlier in the week. The full Senate would then have to approve the measure before it would head to Gov. Tony Evers’ desk.
If approved, the full school day cell phone ban would go into effect on July 1, 2027.
Lawmakers have discussed proposing an item in the next state budget that could include reimbursement for $20 to $30 pouches to keep cell phones unusable until the school day ends.
The bill includes an exception for students that need a cell phone for special education programming that have an individual education plan.
Several groups, including the Wisconsin Association of School District Administrators, registered against the bill while the American Diabetes Association registered its support.
Rep. Linda Brill, R-Sheboygan Falls, said that she was part of a task force that had an off-site day in Oostburg and was told by Superintendent Kevin Bruggink that the new rules are leading students to spend more time on their phones during non-instructional time due to the ban.
“Now they’re late to classes, they’re taking 15-minute bathroom breaks, kids aren’t talking at lunch, there’s actually a term for it called silent lunch,” Brill said during the public hearing. “Kids are getting to lunch and they’re literally in their phones and they’re not even talking to one another.”
The disciplinary action in response to students breaking the cell phone ban will be up to the school district, Brill said.
“I feel like we already took a kick at the cell phone ban and pushing for the schools to go in that direction,” said Sen. Chris Larson, D-Milwaukee. “I’m just curious at why we’re kicking that again without going to the other side. I don’t disagree with what you’re saying, I’m just curious why we’re not … trying to limit social media access to youth because of the damage.”
Brill said that the task force has 10 bills including some that address social media but also one that addresses increased resources for the Internet Crimes Against Children task force.
“I think this is an important piece of making a safer state for our children,” Brill said in response.
Sen. John Jagler, R-Watertown, said that he met with superintendents in his district and they asked for state legislation requiring cell phone bans in schools rather than leaving it entirely up to local control.
“They were too cowardly to do it themselves,” Jagler said.

(The Center Square) – School leaders in New Richmond, Wisconsin could soon be answering questions from federal investigators about their school bathrooms.
The U.S. Department of Education announced an investigation into New Richmond’s bathroom policy that allows biological males to use the girls or women’s restroom.
“Young women should never be forced to share intimate spaces with boys and men because school leaders care more about radical gender ideology than protecting girls’ safety, dignity, and privacy. School board members who ignore these allegations are failing the families they serve. This Administration will investigate this complaint fully and address any violations it discovers promptly,”
Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Kimberly Richey said in a statement.
New Richmond’s school board last month voted down a proposal to change its bathroom policy. Dozens of New Richmond students, almost all of them young women, told school leaders how worried or uncomfortable they are about biological males in their bathrooms.
In response, New Richmond Schools told those young women that they can use a single-stall restroom on the other side of the school building.
Republican congressman and candidate for governor Tom Tiffany took to social media on Thursday to cheer the federal investigation.
“The U.S. Dept. of Ed is launching a Title IX investigation into the New Richmond School District for allowing men in girls’ bathrooms. It’s sick that @GovEvers refuses to stand up for female students,” he wrote. “As governor, I will protect girls’ spaces and put an end to this nonsense.”
The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, which offered New Richmond Schools a new bathroom policy, also weighed in.
“For too long, school districts in Wisconsin (and across the country) have allowed policies that force young girls to share private spaces with biological males. Really great news to see the U.S. Department of Education taking action to enforce Title IX as intended,” WILL’s Cory Brewer said.
There is no word from the Department of Education as to when the investigation will start, or when it may question local school leaders.
New Richmond’s school board has not responded to the investigation. The school board there is set to meet again March 16.

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers signed bills Friday to define grooming as a crime and requiring school districts to define appropriate communication between staff and students.
Rep. Amanda Nedweski, R-Pleasant Prairie, said she was compelled to propose the grooming bill after the Kenosha grooming case of a teacher that led to 12 misdemeanors and sentence of 450 days in jail and three years of probation.
During that case, Nedweski said prosecutors were looking for an enhanced charge and she began working to create a specific grooming law.
The case also led to Nedweski’s sponsoring of the bill on appropriate communications between students and staff.
The Kenosha case involved former teacher Christian Enwright, who was convicted of the misdemeanors after evidence of thousands of text messages over two school years with a then-12-year-old student were shown in court.
“Keeping our kids safe, especially while they’re in our schools, must be a top priority for us, whether it’s addressing grooming, gun violence, bullying, or other harmful behavior,” Evers said in a statement. “We have an important obligation to make sure our kids can feel secure, supported, and cared for by educators and staff in our schools—adults they should be able to trust and depend on—while also providing more clarity about what interactions with students are inappropriate and unacceptable and enhancing punishments for adults who violate that sacred trust,”
The new law would make grooming a felony charge that could lead to 10 years in prison, with further penalty if the offender was in a position of trust over the victim, if there are multiple victims, or if the victim has a disability.
The bill defines grooming as “a course of conduct, pattern of behavior, or series of acts with the intention to condition, seduce, solicit, lure, or entice a child for the purpose of engaging in sexual intercourse or sexual contact or for the purpose of producing, distributing, or possessing depictions of the child engaged in sexually explicit conduct.”
“Defining grooming is a critical step to give law enforcement and local school districts the tools they need to hold bad actors accountable for hurting our kids, and I’m glad the Legislature took this seriously this session and passed bipartisan legislation to get this done,” Evers said.
The communication bill requires school districts to adopt a policy by Sept. 1 that includes punishments, up to firing, for those employees and volunteers who violate the policy in their official capacity.

(The Center Square) – A Wisconsin lawmaker charged with disorderly conduct is scheduled to have her initial court appearance Friday afternoon in Milwaukee County where several judges will be recused from the case.
Sylvia Ortiz-Velez, a Democrat who is not part of the caucus, was charged after a Sept. 2 phone call where she reportedly threatened another member of the Assembly that she would “tell the press negative personal information” if she was not included in writing a Joint Resolution honoring Latino veterans.
Ortiz-Velez left the caucus after the incident.
The charge is a misdemeanor that could lead up to a $1,000 fine and up to 90 days in jail.
Ortiz-Velez’s attorney, Michael Chernin, told The Center Square on Thursday that he could not comment on the case before it was completed.
The complaint states that Ortiz-Velez felt she was intentionally left out of writing the resolution despite the fact that her late husband was a Latino veteran.
The complaint was filed in Milwaukee because both representatives live in Milwaukee and both were in Milwaukee when the phone call occurred.
“These were personal attacks regarding Witness 1 that were outside the bounds of political response,” the complaint said. “The statements were indecent and tended to disrupt the good public order.”
Rep. Jim Piwowarczyk, R-Hubertus, wrote that he was denied the records when he sent a public records request to the state’s Department of Administration for Capitol Police records related to the incident because the “continued confidentiality is material to that prosecution and release would harm the prosecution.”

(The Center Square) – A Wisconsin name, image and likeness bill that would send $15 million annually for athletic facility debt to the University of Wisconsin system could soon reach the Senate floor after passing the Assembly.
But, the Wisconsin Newspaper Association is warning lawmakers and the public that a public records stipulation that could have a sweeping unintended impact that goes well beyond NIL records.
The bill would exempt records related to the “generation, deployment, or allocation of revenue generated by an intercollegiate athletic program.”
“As drafted, it looks to create a sweeping exemption for any financial record connected to a public university’s athletic program,” WNA Executive Director Beth Bennett wrote in testimony. “Public universities are taxpayer-supported institutions. Athletic departments generate and spend millions of dollars in public and quasi-public funds. Decisions about how revenue is raised, allocated, and spent directly affect students, taxpayers, and the broader public.”
UW-Madison Vice Chancellor for Legal Affairs Nancy Lynch told a Senate committee this week that the intention is to codify what the university is currently doing by denying NIL records by citing the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, saying the goal is to “protect our ability to remain competitive by not releasing documents that would provide information about the strategy, the approach and how we’re managing things on an NIL basis.”
Amending the bill would mean the Assembly would need to concur with any changes. The Assembly has completed its session but Gov. Tony Evers has called lawmakers back for a special session on redistricting.
UW-Madison Athletics Director Chris McIntosh said that the $14.6 million annually to the athletic department for facilities debt is essentially for the athletic department to remain competitive and supporting 23 sports and 600-plus athletes.
UW-Madison athletics operated with a $4.3 million surplus in its most recent annual NCAA financial report released earlier this year covering the financial year that ended in June 2025.
The football program accounted for 80% of the program’s revenue, equaling $113.6 million last fiscal year, according to the NCAA report, which showed the football program brought in $72 million in excess during the year.
“In the event that this legislation is not passed, we will be forced to reconcile our revenues with our liabilities, like we always have,” McIntosh told the Senate committee. “And that will come through a series of painful reductions, further emphasis on increasing our revenues.
“And, what I fear is, that through those reductions in support of our sport programs, all of our sport programs, all 23 of our sport programs, we’ll be left in a situation in which it will be difficult to say the least, for us to be competitive in the sports that generate in excess of 80% of the revenues. And it will also be difficult to be competitive.”
Athletic department officials and bill sponsors cited a 2022 marketing report from Philadelphia-based Consult Solutions that claimed each UW-Madison football game brings $19 million of economic impact to Dane County.
Those types of hired marketing reports, however, are consistently rejected by sports economists who point out the flaws in the math used and how they do not factor in items such as diverted spending, crowding out effects and the costs related to large events and facilities.
Sports teams and athletic programs then use those marketing reports to justify public spending, the UW-Madison athletics officials are doing with AB 1034, which does not have a fiscal estimate attached yet.

(The Center Square) – The front-runner to manage Wisconsin’s Medicaid system has a history of missing deadlines, inflating costs and a “questionable track record.”
Wisconsin is finalizing a $1.4 billion contract for a new single fiscal employer agent for Medicaid’s self‑directed care program. The New York-based company Public Partnerships LLC is seen as the front-runner.
But the company has a history that includes some questions.
The state of New York tapped PPL to take over its Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program, but the company missed several key deadlines, including last April’s deadline to begin management.
There were also allegations in New York that that state’s governor, Kathy Hochul, improperly steered its Medicaid management contract to PPL.
“It has been brought to light that the Hochul administration has handed a de facto sole-source contract – under the guise of Medicaid reform, with only the illusion of competitive bidding – to PPL while at the same time receiving consultation about Medicaid reform from PCG, whose executives just happen to have a 25% ownership interest in PPL,” New York Democrat Congressman Ritchie Torres wrote in a letter to federal Medicaid managers in January of last year.
There are also questions about PPL’s performance.
The Legal Aid Society in New York sued PPL over allegations of not paying personal Medicaid assistants. The complaint accused PPL of paying some workers weeks late – or not paying at all for certain periods – and that contacting PPL for resolution was difficult.
In Wisconsin, there are worries about moving from three current Medicaid managers to just one.
Melanie Cairns, managing attorney at Disability Rights Wisconsin, said she worries about poor communication with agents at times and a lack of timeliness when it comes to returning calls and working out resolutions.
“It’s already extremely difficult for IRIS participants to hire workers,” she said. “When there is a delay in getting paid, it’s more likely that they will lose those workers and need to start over.”
Wisconsin has finalized the bids for its new Medicaid manager but has not yet announced which company it will go with. The new contract is supposed to begin in April 2027.

(The Center Square) – There are lots of words of support from Democrats at the Wisconsin Capitol for Gov. Tony Evers special session on redistricting, but the state’s Democratic leaders are measuring their words.
Evers on Tuesday ordered lawmakers back to the Capitol in Madison in April to “ban partisan gerrymandering.”
“Here’s the rub: new maps are redrawn every 10 years, and while Wisconsin has fair maps today, we have no guarantee we’ll continue to have fair maps in the future,” the governor said. “If the Legislature doesn’t act now, our maps could go right back to being rigged, and Wisconsinites could go right back to living under undemocratic maps – we cannot let that happen.”
Evers threatened to call for a special redistricting session during his State of the State speech last month.
Just a few weeks ago, however, he said he did not have buy-in from top Democrats at the Capitol. He said it again Tuesday.
“I feel confident that Democrats feel we are in a good position with fair maps, and I believe they’ll be supportive,” Evers added. “Are there some that may want to see something a little different, a little shaded this way or that way? But at the end of the day, everybody knows that fair maps means what it says.”
Immediately folllowing Evers’ threat in the State of the State, Republicans rejected the idea.
“Purely political and downright hilarious that he’s calling for a special session to ban partisan gerrymandering after he gerrymandered our maps,” Sen. Juian Bradley, R-New Berlin, told The Center Square after the speech. “In 2023, the legislature passed a bill giving him a redistricting commission, and he vetoed it after nearly every Democrat voted against it.”
Evers has proposed redrawn political maps in the past, including the People’s Maps.
Wisconsin Republicans agreed to a new set of legislative maps in 2024, though it was largely because they feared what the liberal-majority Wisconsin Supreme Court would do if they got to draw the maps. The court is currently waiting on a three-judge-panel to make suggestions for Wisconsin’s congressional maps.
Wisconsin’s top legislative Democrats, on Tuesday, mostly talked around the governor’s specific request to end gerrymandering, while claiming to support the idea of “fair maps.”
“The fair maps we passed two years ago have made a difference in Wisconsin,” Democratic Senate Leader Dianne Hesselbein said in a statement. “We now live in a time when the Trump administration has shown its utter disregard for our courts and our democratic system. In Texas, Trump showed he is focused on doing everything he can to create Republican advantages in critical upcoming elections. I am a fighter and my commitment is to make sure the people of Wisconsin have a strong voice in their democracy and that Democrats have the resources and tools to fully participate in whatever redistricting processes may occur in the future.”
“Many of us as Legislative Democrats served under Republicans’ gerrymandered maps for years,” Assembly Democratic chief Greta Neubauer added in a statement of her own. “We deeply understand the importance of competitive maps and remain committed to supporting a redistricting process where the voters’ voices are heard.”

(The Center Square) – There is another bird flu outbreak in Wisconsin after the state’s Department of Agriculture confirmed a case in Dane County.
“The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection has identified a case of highly pathogenic avian influenza in a backyard poultry flock in Dane County,” the department said in an announcement.
DATCP said there were 55 birds in the backyard flock. All of them will have to be put down.
The Dane County case is the second in a week. And it is much smaller than the last.
The state said Friday that more than a million chickens had to be put down after a positive bird flu test at a farm in Jefferson County.
“DATCP and the U.S. Department of Agriculture animal health officials are working together in a joint incident response. The affected premises has been quarantined to restrict movement of poultry and poultry products. Birds on the property will be depopulated to prevent the spread of the disease. Birds from the flock will not enter the food system,” the department said Friday.
The agriculture department said the bird flu has been a problem in Wisconsin and across the country for the past few years.
“The H5N1 HPAI virus has continued to circulate in both wild and domestic birds in North America since December 2021,” DATCP added.
Last year there were also bird flu outbreaks at poultry farms in Jefferson County. Those cases led to the culling of more than 3 million birds. In 2024, Wisconsin’s Department of Ag reported four bird flu cases. Those forced the culling of over 54,000 birds.

(The Center Square) – As the Wisconsin Senate prepares to act on a sports betting bill that passed the Assembly, the Sports Betting Alliance is continuing its push to have the legislation changed to include SBA’s members.
That could mean changing the framework of the bill or making it a constitutional amendment that would go on a statewide ballot, Sports Betting Alliance President/CEO Joe Maloney told reporters Monday afternoon.
The current bill, which resembles legislation previously passed in Florida, would create a hub and spoke model to enable the state’s tribes to conduct online sports wagering, an extension of their current ability to take sports wagers on tribal land.
The tribes would pay Wisconsin a percentage of revenue that would still be negotiated.
“Wisconsin voters definitely want to have a say in this policy and they haven’t gotten that opportunity,” Maloney said.
SBA, which represents DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Fanatics and Bet365, is pushing for a framework to allow those companies to operate and pay the state taxes on revenue like it does is many other states.
Maloney said that those wagering will see less competitive deals if the tribes control wagering through what he called a monopoly.
Complicating the matter is that Fanatics, FanDuel and DraftKings now operate prediction markets on sports events that are federally overseen and do not pay taxes to states.
“The entry of prediction market platforms is a very dynamic topic, of course,” Maloney said in response to a question from The Center Square. “For so long, we’ve communicated about the illegal and unregulated market that are targeting, in this instance, Wisconsinites, taking their business and pushing them into offshore markets or unregulated settings without consumer in place, without responsible gaming controls and without tax dollars going back to the state.”
Maloney said that prediction markets are now operating in Wisconsin from billion-dollar companies that are advertising to residents.
“We have another competitive entrant, an entirely different category of gaming or trading and it is a very dynamic entry into the overall debate right now. So, leaders in Wisconsin have to contemplate now not just illegal and unregulated targeting the residents of their state but also this entirely new category and this federally registered, federally regulated framework that is sidestepping some of the state controls that we see in the traditional online sportsbook model, specifically which grant and deliver millions of tax revenue.”
Maloney criticized the Assembly’s choice to take a voice vote to pass the bill rather than having a recorded vote, calling it “backroom dealing” that voters are beginning to reject.
SBA reported that it spent 64 hours of lobbyist time lobbying against the effort in the second half of 2025. Only the Forest County Potawatomi Community (92 hours) and Ho-Chunk Nation (100 hours) did more lobbying.

(The Center Square) – Public opinion on large-scale data centers in Wisconsin has shifted as 70% of voters say that the costs of the data centers outweigh the benefits.
That’s a change from October, when just 55% believed that the costs outweigh the benefits.
The results are from the most recent Marquette Law School poll, which asked questions of 818 Wisconsin registered voters between Feb. 11-19.
The poll also showed that opposition has risen amongst independents and Democrats but has remained the same amongst Republicans.
Data centers and their benefits have been the subject of several pieces of legislation in the state.
The state has a sales tax exemption for certified data centers in the state that led to $70 million in forgone sales tax in its first two years.
The state has also worked to increase the eligibility of data center projects for tax increment financing about statewide limits, meaning that the new construction does not lead to additional property tax collections for a community.
Data centers in Mount Pleasant, Verona, Beaver Dam and Port Washington have been certified by the state to be eligible for the sales tax exemption.
A group of lawmakers also have introduced a bill to block non-disclosure agreements from being used for data center projects, including testimony from comedian Charlie Berens supporting the bill.
The Data Center Coalition opposed the bill, saying that the NDA bill would put Wisconsin at a “competitive disadvantage” related to attracting data center projects.

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos says he is happy to finally have some justice in the failed effort to boot him from office.
The Wisconsin Elections Commission last week recommended charges against 13 people involved in the failed 2024 recall effort against Vos.
Vos asked the Elections Commission for an investigation after he said a signature check showed that the recall’s hired signature collectors allegedly “unlawfully listed fake addresses, and others fraudulently listed names of circulators who signed affidavits stating they never signed the petition.”
A number of voters in Racine County launched the recall effort because they were unhappy that Vos didn’t disband the elections commission or take other steps after President Donald Trump lost the 2020 election in Wisconsin.
“While it’s disappointing that this referral took so long to make, I am glad that the Commission agreed that there were likely laws broken during these ridiculous recall attempts in 2024,” Vos said in a statement. “I hope the Racine County DA moves quickly to prosecute these individuals. These prosecutions should be a high priority for everyone who cares about election security.”
Vos added that the decision to recommend charges is a victory for election integrity in the state.
But the recommendation for charges in Vos’ case is a stark contrast from the last WEC investigation.
Last summer, the commission found that Madison’s former clerk broke several laws when she did not count nearly 200 absentee ballots.
WEC chairwoman Ann Jacobs said the clerk showed “rather shocking dereliction of just ordinary responsibility,” but Jacobs said there was no need to ask for charges.
That former clerk, Maribeth Witzel-Behl, ultimately resigned from the clerk’s office. Madison, however, continues to fight WEC’s recommendations that Jacobs says will prevent ballots from going un-counted again in the future.

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin taxpayers are growing in their concern over property taxes, as witnessed by a recent Marquette poll showing that 60% of voters are more concerned about reducing property taxes than increasing spending on public schools.
That opinion has shifted over time as 61% of voters were more concerned about funding for schools in Aug. 2018 and polling shifted from favoring funding for schools to being more concerned about property taxes in between late 2022 and mid-2023, according to the poll.
The most recent poll asked questions of 818 Wisconsin registered voters between Feb. 11-19.
The shift comes as state lawmakers continue to debate what the best policy is to spend an expected $2.5 billion surplus at the end of the fiscal year.
Legislative Republicans sent a plan to Gov. Tony Evers that includes $1.5 billion in income tax rebates, $500 million in money for the state’s school tax levy credit and $200 million included for special education funding.
Evers said during his State of the State speech that the plan for property tax relief and education spending must balance the two “a heck of a lot better.”
Assembly Speaker Robin Vos acknowledged during a press conference that Evers won’t negotiate on the school funding he approved with a partial veto that Republicans refer to as Evers’ 400-year property tax increase.
Evers used a partial veto and erased numbers and a hyphen to change “2024-25” to “2425” in the budget bill, locking in a $325 per student per year funding increase for 400 years.
That veto was the subject of a Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling approving the move and then legislation and a constitutional amendment proposal to change the governor’s partial veto power since.

(The Center Square) – There is a warning about pros and cons of public funding for child care in Wisconsin.
The Wisconsin Policy Forum recently said lawmakers must be keenly aware of the “tradeoffs” that come with promising more taxpayer money for day care and other child care centers.
“With child care in Wisconsin already drawing heavily from federal funding, state sources may offer more opportunities for expanding child care revenue, albeit with important policy and political considerations,” the Policy Forum report stated. “Wisconsin could choose to increase the allocation of its current state general purpose revenue, or GPR, to child care, without a new dedicated funding source or increase in existing GPR sources…As with the federal funding, reallocating existing general fund revenues to child care would incur tradeoffs if it involved cutting elsewhere in the current budget.”
The report notes that Wisconsin already spends millions on child care. The WPF report shows that Wisconsin is ranked 10th in national TANF spending for child care. That price tag comes to $231 million.
Researchers say Wisconsin lawmakers have several options to find new money for childcare, including new sin taxes.
“Louisiana complements its tax on sports wagering with the Early Childhood Education Fund,” the report added. “The state has exercised creativity in its revenue sources; while the tax on sports wagering is the primary contributor, the matching fund also claims 50% of the revenue from sales of NBA Pelicans specialty license plates, surplus revenues from payments from casinos to the state, tax revenue from sales of hemp-derived CBD products.”
The Policy Forum said other options could include:
● An income tax credit to employers
● A child care contribution tax credit
● A child and dependent care income tax credit
“These options vary in their popularity and potential impact,” the report noted in its conclusion. “On one side of the spectrum, tax incentives tend to be more popular and bipartisan but may be underutilized and less impactful as they are typically put forward in other states (although they could be engineered to raise more money). On the other side of the spectrum, additional taxes are rarely popular but can have a large financial impact.”