Conservative justices rip Wisconsin Supreme Court decision to fast-track literacy money case
January 27, 2025

Lake Country Tribune

(The Center Square) – Two of Wisconsin’s conservative supreme court justices say the liberal majority is playing politics.

The liberal-majority court last week agreed to accept the case that will decide how $50 million in literacy money put into the current state budget will be spent.

The question for the court is not necessarily the money, but instead, who gets to decide how is spent.

Republican lawmakers included the money in the budget, but Gov. Tony Evers vetoed it out.

Lawmakers wanted to send the money to local schools to buy new books and lesson plans for Wisconsin’s new literacy reforms. The governor said he wanted the Department of Public Instruction to spend the money instead.

Conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley wrote a dissent to the majority’s decision to accept the case, accusing the majority of playing politics.

“The court grants a premature bypass petition filed by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI) and Governor Tony Evers, which presents issues related to the exercise of Governor Evers’ partial veto authority,” she wrote. “Earlier this term, the court heard another case involving the interpretation of the same constitutional provision as applied to the Governor’s partial veto authority. The court has not released its opinion, so the parties in this case do not have the benefit of the court’s decision.”

Chief Justice Annette Ziegler agreed with the dissent.

Bradley added the liberal justices seem to have no legal standards in deciding which cases to fast track, and which to allow to go through the appeals court process.

“Process matters. The members of the majority sometimes enforce a rule against ‘premature petitions’ but sometimes they don’t, without disclosing any standards by which they will choose whether to apply it. Such arbitrariness by courts is antithetical to the original understanding of the judicial role,” Bradley wrote.

But she finished with her strongest accusation, arguing the justices are making decisions for political reasons, and not constitutional questions.

“The majority’s arbitrariness in following its professed procedure in one case while discarding it in another sends a message to litigants that judicial process will be invoked or ignored based on the party filing the petition or the majority’s desired outcome in a politically charged case,” Bradley wrote.

View More Sports Articles

Admirals to Honor Bob Uecker

Admirals to Honor Bob Uecker

The Milwaukee Admirals have announced their plans to honor the legacy of Wisconsin legend, Bob Uecker. Admirals President Jon Greenberg expressed his sadness over losing Uecker on behalf of the organization. In a statement, Greenberg said that the Admirals efforts to...

Lake Country DockHounds to Host Chili Cook Off

Lake Country DockHounds to Host Chili Cook Off

Amidst the frigid weather in Wisconsin this week, the Lake Country DockHounds have announced a chili and soup cook off on Saturday, March 15. The ticketed event will allow guests to sample various warm soups and chilis, then cast their vote for their favorite. The...

NFL Star Zack Baun Purchases Home in Brookfield

NFL Star Zack Baun Purchases Home in Brookfield

Philadelphia Eagles linebacker Zack Baun and his wife, Ali, have purchased a stunning 5,500-square-foot home in Brookfield, Wisconsin, for approximately $1 million. The luxurious four-bedroom property, previously owned by Susan G. Lewis, marks a significant purchase...