(The Center Square) – Wisconsin ranks 33rd in mean household disposable income and 30th in mean household personal income, according to new numbers released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
The average personal household income in the state in the most recent data from 2023 was $154,365 with $137,388 counted as disposable income, or the money taken home after taxes.
The median personal household income, meaning the midpoint instead of the average in order to adjust for high-end earners, was $106,946 with $101,388 considered disposable income after taxes.
Wisconsin has fallen mildly over the 12 years of data as the state fell from 16th in median income in 2013 to the current ranking of 26th amongst states. Mean personal household income remained similar at 29th in 2013 and 29th in 2023.
When the data was all adjusted to 2017 dollars, Wisconsin household personal income went from an average of $117,606 in 2012 to $137,612 in 2023 while the median went from $75,766 in 2012 to $106,946 in 2023.

(The Center Square) – A new lawsuit seeks to upend Wisconsin’s congressional congressional district maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, with plaintiffs urging the courts to throw out “anti-competitive” maps they say disadvantage voters.
The case comes after the state Supreme Court declined to hear two other lawsuits that sought redistricting before 2026.
Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy, the plaintiffs in the case, filed the lawsuit in the Dane County circuit court, not in the state Supreme Court where the earlier attempts at redistricting had been rejected.
According to the lawsuit, the current maps violate the Wisconsin constitution by disadvantaging certain groups of voters relative to others and making races “anti-competitive.”
“Anti-competitive gerrymanders are every bit as antithetical to democracy, and to law, as partisan gerrymanders and racial gerrymanders,” the lawsuit says. “This is because electoral competition is as vital to democracy as partisan fairness.”
The lawsuit points to recent electoral history as evidence, with seven out of eight congressional districts under the 2022 maps producing margins of victory greater than 20 percentage points, and five districts having produced a margin exceeding 30 points.
Only the 3rd district, currently represented by U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wisconsin, has seen races decided by fewer than 10 points, according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit says that because the current maps were chosen by the state Supreme Court based on a “least change” approach, they “perpetuated” the maps imposed by Act 44 in 2011 after the 2010 census.
The goal of those maps, according to the lawsuit, was not just partisan advantage but mutual, bipartisan incumbent protection – creating maps with deliberately uncompetitive districts to insulate Wisconsin’s U.S. representatives.
Notably, before the 2011 maps took effect, Democrats held five of Wisconsin’s eight U.S. House seats compared to three for Republicans.
Today, Republicans hold six seats, with only two, held by Van Orden and U.S. Rep. Bryan Steil, R-Wisconsin, being considered competitive.
“An anti-competitive gerrymander occurs when elected officials work in concert to draw district lines to suppress electoral competition, thereby benefiting incumbent politicians to the detriment of voters,” the lawsuit says. “Candidates prevail by larger margins, fewer districts are competitive, and less legislative turnover occurs, undermining core democratic values of accountability and responsiveness.”
The lawsuit names the Wisconsin Elections Commission as the defendant in the case.
WEC did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment at the time of publication.

(The Center Square) – More Wisconsin students are taking dual enrollment courses than before with 78,703 students taking dual enrollment courses with the University of Wisconsin and Wisconsin Technical College, according to a new report from Wisconsin Policy Institute.
The numbers are a 3.4% increase from a year before and represent 26.6% of the state’s public school students.
Dual enrollment allows high school students to earn college credit while taking courses at their high school to enter post-secondary school after graduation with college credit already earned.
More high school students are both offered and taking the courses as the costs of college continue to increase, including a 5% resident undergraduate tuition increase in the University of Wisconsin System expected to be approved on Thursday.
“Providing students with opportunities for college or university coursework is a priority for Wisconsin, as demonstrated by its inclusion on the state’s school report cards and its popular adoption across high schools,” the report said. “Dual enrollment is the most widespread of these programs and has been steadily growing for the past decade, perhaps due to the range of benefits that dual enrollment programs offer students and schools.”
The Wisconsin Technical College dual enrollment program currently has four times the students at dual enrollment through the University of Wisconsin. But the University of Wisconsin program grew at a 12% year over year rate for 15,588 students, faster than the technical college program growth, which grew 1.5% to 63,115 students, according to the report.
Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate courses are counted separately but can also lead to college credit.
Another issue detailed in the report is the availability of the courses in schools, with larger and higher income schools having more course offerings.
Numbers from 2023 show that 85.7% of public high schools had dual enrollment, 73.9% had AP courses and 68.4% offered both.
Just have of high schools with 75% of students identified as economically disadvantaged offered dual enrollment but 91.1% of school where less than 25% had the same household designation had dual enrollment offerings.
Urban schools had a 19.7% dual enrollment participation rate while suburban schools had 28.3% participation, towns had 30.1% and rural communities had a 27.6% participation rate.
“Schools that offer no postsecondary opportunities, which are usually small and have high rates of poverty, may want to consider how they could work with the college systems to begin their own dual enrollment programs,” the report said. “Small schools would gain access to more resources and class offerings, and students from schools with high poverty rates could benefit from reduced educational costs and job-related training opportunities.”

(The Center Square) – The National Right to Work Foundation has filed an amicus brief in support of an appeal of a ruling that overturned Wisconsin’s Act 10.
The brief contends that Wisconsin “can define and limit the parameters of exclusive representation as it sees fit” and union monopoly bargaining power is not a “right” allowed by the Wisconsin or U.S. Constitution.
The brief also states that the Dane County Circuit Court did not consider if it could expanded the pro-employee liberty provisions to cover all public departments in the law as a solution to correct the alleged imbalances the court said it saw.
Wisconsin Institute of Law and Liberty client Kristi Koschkee previously filed a motion to intervene in the appeal.
Act 10 limited most public sector union contract negotiations to salaries only and capped those salary increases to the rate of inflation after being signed into law in 2011 by then-Gov. Scott Walker.
The law, however, was overturned in December and an appeal of that ruling was filed.
Act 10’s biggest impact was on teachers’ unions and law supporters say those limits, along with other reforms, have saved Wisconsin taxpayers between $18 billion and $31 billion since 2011.
“Act 10 is a simple recognition that voters and taxpayers – not unelected union bosses – should be in control of how the public services Wisconsinites fund are managed,” National Right to Work Foundation President Mark Mix said in a statement. “But the union boss attempt to nix it is an even more egregious attack on Wisconsin public workers, who under union officials’ proposed regime would be forced to sacrifice to unions the right to freely choose who will speak for them on workplace matters.
“Even convicted felons have the right to choose their own representation, but union officials seek to deny this right to dissenting public employees.”

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin’s new state budget may not help with the top issue for voters in the state.
The Institute for Reforming Governor released the results of a new poll that says wasteful state spending is the number one issue for voters in the state.
“Eight-one percent of all voters (67% Dems, 94% GOP, 85% Independents) said cutting wasteful state spending was more important than the 14% who choose increasing state tax revenue,” IRG said in the poll.
The poll added that 50% of Wisconsin voters disapprove of state spending growth over time, compared to 38% who approve.
The new state budget adds more than $12.5 billion in new spending, and comes with a $111 billion, two-year price tag.
IRG’s poll said a lot of voters would have liked to have gone the opposite way.
65% of all voters (46% Democrats, 83% GOP, 60% Independents) favored cutting
state spending
59% all voters (40% Democrats, 78% GOP, 56% Independents) favored freezing
state spending
70% all voters (59% Democrats, 81% GOP, 65% Independents) favored limiting
state spending increases to inflation plus increase in population
The poll says health care is the second most important issue for Wisconsin voters.
“When it comes to health care, the biggest concerns are the high cost of health care and high cost of insurance,” pollsters said.
The poll notes that 22% of all voters in the state say health care is the top priority.
While Gov. Tony Evers couldn’t get his long-sought after Medicaid expansion, lawmakers did agree to a hospital assessment tax that will be used to supercharge Medicaid reimbursement in Wisconsin.
IRG says the poll was conducted in cooperation with Napolitan News Service and Scott Rasmussen in 2025, with the focus in this poll on what Wisconsinites want to see from policymakers.

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers recently signed a bill to create an exception to the state’s tax incremental financing rules for data centers in Port Washington and Beaver Dam.
The bill, now 2025 Wisconsin Act 16, grants an exception to the state’s 12% cap on the amount of total municipal property value that can be included in TIF districts, as long as the new project costs are strictly related to certified data centers.
Under the exception, municipalities can use the future growth in property tax revenue generated within the district solely to cover data center-related costs, The Center Square previously reported.
Evers and lawmakers alike hope the act will incentivize companies to build data centers in both cities.
“Wisconsin’s tech industry is growing and bringing with it countless family-supporting jobs, economic development opportunities, and substantial capital investments in our local communities,” Evers said in a statement. “This bill will help these two communities compete for new data centers, bolster our local communities, and build upon our work to build a 21st-century workforce and economy.”
A planned data center in Port Washington is expected to be built and could open before the end of the year.
Additionally, Meta is discussing a nearly $1 billion data center in Beaver Dam, Bloomberg reported.
However, there are concerns that tax exemptions for data centers might not always benefit a community.
According to a report from Good Jobs First, at least 10 states are currently losing $100 million or more in taxes from data centers, The Center Square reported.
The Center Square also reported a poll by Libertas Network that showed a majority of U.S. voters oppose data centers being built in their community, and even more oppose the data centers if tax incentives are awarded to have them built.
However, Evers touted the act’s overwhelming bipartisan support in his statement, with the bill having passed the Wisconsin state Senate 28-3 and the Assembly 91-6.

(The Center Square) – A Wisconsin Elections Commission investigation has found former Madison City cCerk Maribeth Witzel-Behl broke the law by leaving 193 absentee ballots uncounted during the 2024 general election.
The investigation’s results, released Wednesday, condemned Witzel-Behl for not counting the ballots upon discovering them, even though there was still time left to include them in the final tally.
Instead, after learning about the ballots, she had gone on vacation.
WEC said Witzel-Behl’s actions were a “profound failure” that undermines public confidence in elections.
“The lack of action by the city clerk with regard to the found ballots is astonishing,” WEC commissioners said in a letter about the investigation’s findings. “She demonstrated no urgency, let alone interest, in including those votes in the election tally. That would have required the city clerk to take the urgent action that the situation demanded.”
While WEC blamed Witzel-Behl, the report also found her staff and deputy were also to blame for letting the ballots go uncounted.
“There was a complete lack of leadership in the city clerk’s office,” WEC said. “It was the job of the city clerk to immediately take action once notified about the found ballots, and she did nothing. It was the responsibility of the deputy clerk to take action in her absence, and he did nothing.”
WEC said Witzel-Behl treated the ballots as “unimportant and a reconciliation nuisance,” rather than as a part of the democracy they represent.
Madison Mayor Satya Rhodes-Conway suspended Witzel-Behl from her role as clerk after the election, and she then resigned in April.
Michael Haas, the city’s acting clerk, said the city cooperated with WEC throughout the investigative process.
“I want to thank Commissioners and WEC staff for conducting a thorough inquiry into this matter, as well as City staff who provided documents and testimony,” Haas said in a statement. “We are currently reviewing WEC’s report and hope that it can provide lessons that we and other Wisconsin clerks can learn to prevent similar errors in the future.”
Haas added that city officials may have additional comments and recommendations on the investigation’s findings at an upcoming WEC meeting July 17.

(The Center Square) – A recent Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling that stripped the state’s Joint Committee of Review of Administrative Rules from blocking or suspending agency rules is drawing sharp reactions from state lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.
The court’s 4-3 ruling sided with Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and executive agencies over Sen. Howard Marklein, R-Spring Green, the lead respondent in the case on behalf of the Legislature.
The court declared that the committee cannot pause, object to, or suspend rules unless the Legislature passes a bill, calling the current process unconstitutional.
Legislators responded with familiar partisan accusations of overreach against both sides.
“The recent Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling stripping the Legislature’s ability to oversee administrative rules is a dangerous overreach that undermines the foundational checks and balances in our state government,” Sen. Cory Tomczyk, R-Mosinee, a member of the committee, said in a statement.
Tomczyk said the ruling upends decades of precedent and hands “unelected bureaucrats” unchecked power.
“By stripping this oversight, the Court has effectively handed unilateral rulemaking authority to the executive branch, cutting the elected representatives of the people out of the process entirely,” Tomczyk said. “This is not just a procedural change. It is a direct blow to representative government.”
However, Sen. Kelda Roys, D-Madison, who also sits on the committee, lauded the court’s ruling.
“Under Republican rule, JCRAR and other committees have abused their power, unconstitutionally working to prevent the executive branch from carrying out our laws,” Roys said. “The legislature has the power to pass laws – not veto them after enactment.”
Roys cited PFAS contamination and election security as some of the “pressing problems” that Republicans used the committee to prevent the executive branch from addressing.
Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, called the ruling a “disappointing decision” and accused the court of removing oversight from the people’s elected officials.
“Administrative rules touch many facets of our lives, such as business regulations, license renewals, building projects, wetland mitigation, and more,” Vos said. “The absence of oversight from elected representatives grows government and allows unelected bureaucrats to increase red-tape behind closed doors.”
He added, quoting Justice Rebecca Bradley’s dissent, “Progressives like to protest against ‘kings’ – unless it is one of their own making.”
A spokesperson for Marklein’s office declined to respond for comment.

(The Center Square) – The University of Wisconsin’s latest proposed tuition increase is not very popular with some lawmakers in Madison.
UW President Jay Rothman on Tuesday announced a plan to allow campuses to raise tuition by up to 5%, starting this fall.
“Preserving quality while maintaining our ability to be a leader on tuition affordability in the Midwest is a top priority,” Rothman said in a statement. “After a decade of a tuition freeze and lagging state aid, we believe we have struck a balance for students and families with this proposal and the recent state investments in the UWs as part of the 2025-27 biennial budget.”
The tuition hike plan comes after increases in both 2023 and 2024, and after lawmakers agreed to give the UW almost $300 million more in the new state budget.
It also comes after a report that showed the university spent hundreds of millions of dollars more on salaries and benefits for UW employees.
“In the last decade, the UW not only lost 16,000 students, but bloated its budget and increased the salaries of its academic staff by $697 million,” Sen. Eric Wimberger, R-Oconto, said. “[The] UW has also chosen to prioritize DEI and irrelevant courses over rightsizing and efficiency. Instead of simply returning their staff-to-student ratio to what it was 10 years ago, UW chose to resist reform, demanding more and more from the
state and its students.”
“Students will continue to bear the cost of the UW’s fiscal mismanagement until the admin faces the reality of their demographic problems,” Rep. Amanda Nedweski, R-Pleasant Prairie, said on X. “Wisconsin graduated 67k students this spring. The 1st grade class had 52k kids. The time to consolidate programs and campuses is right now.”
Enrollment at the UW’s 13 four-year campuses largely held steady, though some campuses did see fewer students last fall.
With the tuition increase, in-state tuition at UW-Madison will jump to more than $12,000. Tuition at UW-Milwaukee, UW-Eau Claire, and UW-La Crosse will see their tuition costs jump to more than $10,000. All other campuses will be between nearly $8,600 and just lrdd than $10,000.

(The Center Square) – Whitefish Bay Resident Bill Berrien announced on Wednesday he plans to run for Wisconsin governor as a Republican.
Berrien joins Washington County Executive Josh Schoemann in the 2026 run for governor.
Schoemann led U.S. Rep. Tom Tiffany, WI-7th Congressional, in a straw poll at the Republican Party of Wisconsin convention in May. Tiffany has not announced if he is running in the race.
Gov. Tony Evers has also said he will announce his decision on if he will run for governor again after the state budget was completed but he declined to make an announcement when asked at a press conference while he signed the budget at 1:30 a.m. last week.
Senate President Mary Felzkowski also declined to say if she would run after she voted against the state budget deal, the first time a Senate President in Wisconsin had done so.
Berrien is owner and CEO of Pindel Global Precision and Liberty Precision, manufacturing companies that make precision-machined components.
He advertised himself as a Navy SEAL for nine years who first took part in Army Ranger School and the SEAL Sniper Course.
“Bureaucrats and politicians like Tony Evers have failed Wisconsin,” Berrien said in a statement. “They sold our land to China, encouraged illegal immigration in our communities, and welcomed boys into our daughters’ sports and locker rooms. The time for change is now.”
Wisconsin Democrat Chair Devin Remiker responded to the announcement by noting Berrien’s wealth.
“Bill Berrien’s rich enough to buy himself some attention and clueless enough to think that’s going to work — just like Elon Musk did this past April only to see his political career end,” Remiker said in a statement. “The WisDems are already building on our playbook that helped take down Brad Schimel, Tim Michels, and Eric Hovde, and we have no doubt we’ll be in an even stronger position to defeat whoever Trump handpicks to do his bidding in the primary and emerges as the nominee.”
Berrien said that he want to put Wisconsin residents first, building American and taking the “fight to China.”
“I’ll back the blue and get criminal illegal immigrants off our streets, and as a dad and coach, I promise to protect our daughters,” Berrien said. “Just like President Trump, I’m a political outsider and a businessman. It’s time that we fire the bureaucrats and hire a businessman to fix the problems and take our state back.”

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers’ partial veto to lower the daily cost of housing juvenile offenders for counties by $2,000 has created a “$34 million hole” in the state’s Department of Corrections budget, according to Sen. Van Wanggaard, R-Racine.
While the Legislature had approved a provision in the 2025-27 biennial budget to raise the county cost of maximum-security, long-term juvenile housing to $2,501 per person in 2025-26 and $2,758 in 2026-27, Evers’ veto established a new rate of $501 per person in 2025-26 and $758 in 2026-27, cutting the Legislature’s costs by $2,000 exactly.
The lower rate would allow counties to pay less to house inmates, but would force the state to take up the remainder of the costs.
According to documents first released to The Center Square, the Legislative Fiscal Bureau estimated the cost shift would force the state to pay $34.4 million from 2025-27, or 75% of the cost to incarcerate juvenile inmates.
No funds were allocated for the state to cover that cost.
“Evers’ veto of this provision is unsustainable and he knows it,” said Wanggaard, chairman of the state Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.
According to Wanggaard, the statutory daily rate is “simple math,” determined by the total cost to operate juvenile facilities divided by the average population.
Wanggaard criticized Evers’ decision to “unilaterally” veto the county’s expenses and make the state pay up more without the Legislature’s approval.
“It flips the entire funding of juvenile corrections without debate or discussion,” Wanggaard said. “It’s irresponsible.”
However, Evers said the Legislature-approved rate of $2,501 and $2,578 over the biennium was too much for counties since it would have increased the current $1,268 daily rate by more than $1,000 per day.
“This increase and funding model is untenable, and counties have expressed that this unaffordable increase will have serious and detrimental effects on other county services,” Evers said in his veto message. “With this veto, I am establishing daily rates while still ensuring it is manageable for local partners.”
The veto came after the Legislature also approved more than $27 million to provide funding and staffing for a new maximum-security juvenile detention facility in Milwaukee.

(The Center Square) – A $34.5 million road reconstruction project for Milwaukee’s 6th Street has lost its funds under President Donald Trump’s budget reconciliation bill, leaving the future of the project in jeopardy until the city can secure new funding.
The funds were originally awarded through the U.S. Department of Transportation’s neighborhood access and equity grant program, but were rescinded by the bill signed into law by Trump on Friday.
Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson, a Democrat, criticized the rescission as “harmful.”
“This project would have made a high-injury traffic corridor safer, created over 450 good-paying jobs, and created tens-of-millions of dollars in local economic impacts,” Johnson said in a statement. “Unfortunately, congressional Republicans and the White House chose not to support improvements to public safety, good-paying jobs, and economic development.”
While the money was not yet legally obligated, it had been awarded by USDOT and announced by President Joe Biden during a March 2024 visit to the city.
Had the funds continued, a 2.6-mile stretch of the city from National Avenue to North Avenue would have tentatively been under reconstruction until 2031.
The project would have focused on reconnecting “displaced” neighborhoods, improving sidewalks, dedicating transit and bicycle lanes, adding tree canopies, and narrowing streets to remove “unwarranted” pavement and reduce vehicle speeds, according to a City of Milwaukee webpage.
The Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s community maps portal indicates more than a dozen accidents directly related to speeding have occurred on that stretch of 6th Street since 2015.
Additionally, a Badger Institute report found the number of traffic fatalities in Milwaukee County increased by 77% from 2002 (52 deaths) to 2024 (94 deaths), while fatalities in all other Wisconsin counties decreased by 35%.
City engineer Kevin Muhs indicated to the Daily Reporter that while the city would continue the design and “some of” the engineering work, the project’s funds would have to come from a new federal grant or a combination of local and federal funds.

(The Center Square) – Resident undergraduate tuition in the University of Wisconsin System could increase by 5% at most of its universities if the plan is approved by the Board of Regents on Thursday.
The plan calls for a base 4% undergraduate tuition increase with an optional 1% increase that will be used by all of the schools except UW-Green Bay, University of Wisconsin President Jay Rothman said.
UW-River Falls, meanwhile, will see a 5.8% increase.
“Preserving quality while maintaining our ability to be a leader on tuition affordability in the Midwest is a top priority,” Rothman said. “After a decade of a tuition freeze and lagging state aid, we believe we have struck a balance for students and families with this proposal and the recent state investments in the UWs as part of the 2025-27 biennial budget.”
The new state budget included a two-year $256 million budget increase. That increase included $100 million for campuses statewide, $94 million to increase staff wages and $54 million to help retain and recruit faculty and staff in “high-demand fields of study.”
The school said that resident undergraduate tuition increased 7.7% from 2015 to 2025.
Resident undergraduate tuition and segregated fees would now be led by UW-Madison at $12,166 followed by UW-Milwaukee at $10,916, UW-La Crosse at $10,360, UW-Eau Claire at $10,067, UW-Stout at $9,859, UW-Stevens Point at $9,477, UW-Superior at $9,272 and UW-River Falls at $9,249.
That is followed by UW-Oshkosh at $8,993, UW-Green Bay at $8,985, UW-Whitewater at $8,819, UW-Platteville at $8,812 and UW-Parkside at $8,658.
State funding represents about one-fifth of the funding for the schools.
“Thankfully, the governor and legislature approved a significant budget increase, the largest in over two decades, which enables us to preserve access and affordability,” Rothman said. “Our public universities have become tuition-dependent due to lagging state funding in prior years, and the turnaround this budget cycle will help us continue providing educational opportunities to the next generation of Wisconsinites.”

(The Center Square) – Wisconsin’s Supreme Court determined that the state’s Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules cannot block rules from being enforced in a Tuesday ruling.
Four justices agreed with the ruling, Justice Brian Hagedorn concurred in part and dissented in part while two justices disagreed.
The case was brought by Gov. Tony Evers after he claimed the committee unlawfully blocked a pair of rules on building codes and a rule for therapists concerning conversion therapy.
Hagedorn wrote that the argument regarding therapists is now moot and the indefinite block of the building code rule is unconstitutional but that doesn’t make the entire statute allowing administrative blocks on rules is unconstitutional and believes that Evers did not make a thorough claim to justify a broad ruling.
“The majority’s rationale, which it neither supports nor explains, raises more questions than it answers,” Hagedorn wrote. “It attempts a narrow resolution to this case, but it does not recognize the hornet’s nest of constitutional issues implicated by its ill-considered solution.”
Evers claimed that Republican committee members overstepped their power and there needs to be a separation of powers after the required rule-making process is complete.
“Wisconsinites want to protect our constitutional checks and balances,” Evers said in a statement. “Today’s Wisconsin Supreme Court decision ensures that no small group of lawmakers has the sole power to stymie the work of state government and go unchecked. This is an incredibly important decision that will ensure state government can do our important work efficiently and effectively to serve Wisconsinites across our state.”
The committee had blocked the building code rule until the Legislature came up with a new law pertaining to it, which Hagedorn acknowledged could never occur.
“Before concluding we note that the Legislature retains power over the administrative rulemaking process regardless of our determination here,” the majority opinion from Justice Jill Karofsky said. “The Legislature created the current process. It alone maintains the ability to amend, expand, or limit the breadth of administrative rulemaking in the other branches—as long as it adheres to the constitution, including the provisions of bicameralism and presentment.”
Justice Annette Ziegler’s dissenting opinion, meanwhile, said that the ruling upended a pair of prior rulings on the topic from the Supreme Court without proper analysis of the Wisconsin Constitution.
“For over three decades, all three branches of government in Wisconsin have operated with the understanding that JCRAR may lawfully review rulemaking undertaken by the executive branch,” Ziegler wrote. “With the stroke of a pen, that practice is invalidated.”